Comments on: Smashing Pumpkins: Zeitgeist (”Review” 2 of 3)

By: hotshotrobot

hotshotrobot — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:42:30 +0000

I would suggest you look at the following photo, and then try telling me again that the band doesn’t deserve to be insulted:

By: Tristessa

Tristessa — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:42:53 +0000

You're judging them based on Adore, MACHINA and Zeitgeist. Even though the first two I mentioned are quite good, the first three albums released by the Smashing Pumpkins are definitely their best, and there isn't even a mention of Siamese Dream and Gish in this review. You're insulting the band instead of the album in places, when only the album actually deserves it.

By: Year33

Year33 — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:45:57 +0000

As a lover of the album, I still found this review entertaining and a good read. Enjoyed with a grain of salt!

By: SP_07

SP_07 — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:04:48 +0000

Smashing Pumpkins are the best band on the planet. Although this review made me chuckle here and there, the content is complete shit.

By: Sam E.

Sam E. — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:25:26 +0000

wait…Warrant had a third record?

By: Borch

Borch — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:42:35 +0000

1) Awesome album ‘cover’, 2) Billy and the Boingers… ha ha, takes me back, and 3) everyone knows that Cleveland is the datum for all failures, but comparisons to Smashing Pumpkins? That’s a low blow, stick to the river catching on fire.

By: j03

j03 — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:18:31 +0000

I thought Siamese Dream was a good album. I could pretty much do without the rest of their catalogue, though.