 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portishead&#8217;s Third Attempt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-reviews-2/music-reviews/portisheads-third-attempt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-reviews-2/music-reviews/portisheads-third-attempt/</link>
	<description>What Are You Listening To, Commie?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dixie</title>
		<link>http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-reviews-2/music-reviews/portisheads-third-attempt/#comment-145740</link>
		<dc:creator>dixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-news/music-news/portisheads-third-attempt/#comment-145740</guid>
		<description>the whole songs not going anywhere thing is also my main complaint.  i'm willing to deal, what with the whole first music from them in a decade thing, but it is a little disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole songs not going anywhere thing is also my main complaint.  i&#8217;m willing to deal, what with the whole first music from them in a decade thing, but it is a little disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-reviews-2/music-reviews/portisheads-third-attempt/#comment-144273</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-news/music-news/portisheads-third-attempt/#comment-144273</guid>
		<description>i actually think it's really good. i'm glad it's not just a re-hash of previous records; it's different. 

the absence of scratching is a good thing. they can't do that on every single song, every single record. that would get effing old. 

shrug. i think it's a solid record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually think it&#8217;s really good. i&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s not just a re-hash of previous records; it&#8217;s different. </p>
<p>the absence of scratching is a good thing. they can&#8217;t do that on every single song, every single record. that would get effing old. </p>
<p>shrug. i think it&#8217;s a solid record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joiezabel</title>
		<link>http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-reviews-2/music-reviews/portisheads-third-attempt/#comment-144255</link>
		<dc:creator>joiezabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superstarcastic.com/music-news/music-news/portisheads-third-attempt/#comment-144255</guid>
		<description>i agree withyou for the most part, but i actually think 'the rip' is a kickass song.  i love the steady build through the whole thing.  

but the rest of the album was kind of a let-down.  i expected more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree withyou for the most part, but i actually think &#8216;the rip&#8217; is a kickass song.  i love the steady build through the whole thing.  </p>
<p>but the rest of the album was kind of a let-down.  i expected more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
